A national level ‘Minority Media Conclave’ was held with an attempt to bridge the gap between different language media and deliberate on the issues of coverage of events and developments related to the minority communities. The conclave was organised by Maeeshat Media at the Constitution Club of India, New Delhi on 23 December.
Delivering the inaugural speech, Zafar Mahmood, President Zakat Foundation of India, cited the data to show the weak representation of Muslims in different sectors right from the Parliament to the academic arena. Reminding the duty of media persons, he said: “You are human beings first before being media persons. So think of humanity first. Social morality should prevail over commercial interests within your premises (news establishments).”
“Don’t give undue weightage to politics though it’s an easy way to get TRPs. But there are other important issues as well,” Mahmood urged the media persons participating in the conclave.
Earlier, the programme commenced with Danish Reyaz, Director of Maeeshat Media. In his introduction, he enlightened the audience with the purpose and prospects of the conclave.
The event witnessed two panel discussions. Representatives from English, Hindi and Urdu media participated in the discussion. First discussion on ‘Bridge the gap among all mediums’ (English/Hindi/Urdu) of the media, exchange news and views; Develop consensus on all important issues’ was held with Maulana Ejaz Ahmed Aslam, Editor-in-Chief of Radiance Viewsweekly.
Iqbal Ahmad of BBC Hindi was among the panellists. He pointed out, “We should ponder whether the gaps we are talking about are on wrong ground or what. Every media enjoys its own specific viewership; therefore, it ensures the interests of them. But there are some issues as poverty, illiteracy and injustice which should be common for all.”
Mayank Singh of News Bench emphasised on the gap in the context of different media and insisted that the media persons must analysis whether “this gap is in content or issues, then talk of solutions.”
Abdussalam Asim, Chief Editor of UNI, criticised the Urdu media, saying its reaction is severe. “We are on two extremes; we should come out of our comfort zone to introspect ourselves.”
On the contrary, Qasim Syed, Chief Editor of Urdu daily Khabrain defended the Urdu media: “As much as 90% of the media is in the hands of Corporates and hence they dictate our issues and problems in the view of their vested interests.”
In his presidential remark, Ejaz Ahmed Aslam said, “There are two major trends in our country: one which divides the people of India and the other which safeguards the basic spirit and ethos of our Constitution. We should support the latter.” He added, “Our Constitution guarantees social, political and economic justice; therefore we should promote moral and human values enshrined therein.”
The second panel discussion witnessed vocal remarks of its president Ram Bahadur Rai, Chief Editor of Yathawat magazine. Deliberating on the ‘Role of Alternate Media: Challenges and Opportunities’, Dilip C Mandal, former Managing Editor India Today (Hindi), was hesitant to use the term ‘minority media’ and suggested: “We have to change the language and grammar of minority discourse.”
He repeatedly blamed the Muslim intelligentsia on their failure with regards to the backwardness of the community. “Why Muslims are lagging in public sector and in education if it has not been the central point of community intelligentsia? If this is not happening, then clearly it is their failure,” he criticised and added, “Though it should be also the central question of the government. If every seventh person of this country is backward, then this country is not moving ahead but has no hope in the present government.”
Anil Pandey, General Secretary of Delhi Journalist Association, cited experiments of Aapan Khabar of Muzaffarpur, Baal Ki Khaal magazine of Bhopal and Khabar Lahariya as examples of an alternate media and wished a prosperous future for the same.
In his presidential speech, Ram Bahadur Rai poured out his thoughts. Terming the Press Club of India (in Delhi) as ‘Daru Club of India’, he alleged: “If you visit that building, wahan khabar ki khushbu naheen daru ki badboo aati hai (one finds odour of wine rather than the smell of news there at the Press Club)”.
Rejecting the idea of alternate media, he said: “I term alternate media as anarchy media.” But later on, when he was asked why he called it ‘anarchy media’, he clarified: “I term alternate media, especially social media, as this is where everyone writes what he/she wants. If you show me an example of alternate media that survives on advertisement and not on the mercy of donations from corporate, then I will count it as a success story.”
He further rejected in toto that there is democracy in media. “If you can’t write what you want, then how do you have freedom of expression?”
Rai demanded the Modi government to set up the third Press Commission to ensure owning of property rights of media persons and so on to democratise the arena.
Questions and comments from the audience made the whole discussion very healthy and informative. Earlier, all participants stood silently for two minutes in the condolence for martyrs (children) of Peshawar attack.