Now about Post-World Cup Political Games

Soroor Ahmed sees through the ramifications of FIFA World Cup in Qatar and underlines the scope for the post-tournament social, political and economic analyses.

Written by

Soroor Ahmed

Published on

Soroor Ahmed sees through the ramifications of FIFA World Cup in Qatar and underlines the scope for the post-tournament social, political and economic analyses.

Though the FIFA World Cup in Qatar ended on a positive note and left some lasting impact, there stillremains some scope for the post-tournament social, political and economic analyses.

Such big jamborees do not only provide an opportunity for various countries to exhibit theirsporting excellence but also give a chance to understand a different type of games being played in theworld.



For example, when the Iranian footballers refuse to sing the national anthem during their first matchwith England to express their solidarity towards the protest movement in their own country, thewesternmedia made it a big issue. But they did not highlight the fact that the players and spectators fromMorocco openly defied their own government’s policy on Israel and raise voices in favour ofPalestinians and waved their flag after every match they played.

Two years back, in December 2020, Morocco and Israel normalised their relationship and the former signeda security understanding agreement with the Jewish state on November 24, 2021. The United Statesplayed a very crucial role in brokering this pact. Washington, in return, supported Morocco’s claim onWestern Sahara.

The Polisario Front has been fighting for the independence of Western Sahara with the help ofAlgeria. This region had been in occupation of Spain till 1975. Now Morocco annexed a large part ofWestern Sahara.

Algeria, in August 2021, snapped its ties with Morocco some months after the US decision to supportthe latter. Spain, which in fact had colonised the Western Sahara, now backs Morocco’s position. Allthis just because the monarch in Rabat decided to become friend of Israel.Angry Algeria, the main supplier of gas to Spain, cancelled its 20-year long friendship treaty withMadrid.

The action of the average Moroccans and their players in Qatar is quite contrary to the policy of thegovernment. Not only this, in spite of the Abraham Accord signed between Israel and some Arab countries, for example UAE and Bahrain, there was general Arab support for the cause of Palestinians.This aspect was underplayed by the international media for obvious reasons.



The World Cup attracted a large number of labours, especially from India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka,Bangladesh and Nepal. There were reports of exploitation of these work forces – a commonphenomenon acrossthe planet – yet the 28-day long show provided lakhs of jobs. Now there is fear that a large number ofthem may be sent back to their respective countries as there is no work left. The World Cup wasallotted to Qatar way back in 2010 and since then the economic activities increased. As there wasconstruction boom, it attracted a lot of engineers, safety managers, and other skilled and semi-skilledworkers.

Incidentally, these economic activities came as a saving grace for many as pandemic and subsequentglobal recession rendered millions of people unemployed.

The countries of South Asia in particular may witness a fall in remittance money if the labourersreturn to their homes. Besides, they would further aggravate the job crisis in their respectivecountries.

Sadly, the layoff will come when almost all these South Asian countries are facing serious economiccrisis. Sri Lanka and Pakistan passed through turmoil while Bangladesh and Nepal (where election washeld recently) are facing political uncertainty.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine further fuelled the economic crisis in the world, especially in denselypopulated countries of South Asia.



The Qataris will have to adjust to the post-World Cup situation. Though it was accused of lavishspending – 12 to 15 times more than the previous World Cups held in Russia and Brazil in 2018 and2014 – yet it is also a fact that this global event was much better organised than many previous ones.

It needs to be mentioned that such sporting festivals do have severe economic fall-out. For instance,it took 30 years for Canada to repay the loan taken for the 1976 Montreal Olympic. Greece turnedbankrupt after the 2004 Olympic.

Charges of corruption are also levelled before and after such big extravaganza. It was also allegedthat Qatar got the World Cup when it bribed the FIFA top brass.

In June 2017, Saudi Arabia, along with United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Egypt, cut ties with Qatar onthe charge of backing Islamic terrorists’ outfits. The Saudis imposed economic blockade on Qatar.Iran came to its rescue then.

This sudden severing of ties landed the then Donald Trump administration in a fix as US CentralCommand base is situated in Qatar.

It was then alleged that Saudis were actually jealous of Qatar getting the FIFA World Cup. Five yearslater the Saudi team played here and defeated none else but Argentina in the first game.



Many politicians and officials were blamed for largescale corruption after the 2010 CommonwealthGames held in Delhi. The campaign of India Against Corruption started in April 2011 led to the declineof Congress, both in Delhi and India. Though the movement started with the fast by anna Hazare, the mainpolitical beneficiary was Arvind Kejriwal, who emerged as the chief minister of the state a couple ofyears later. He dislodged the 15 years long Sheila Dikshit government.Today he and his Aam Aadmi Party are nursing a much bigger ambition.

Nationally the weakening of Congress created a political vacuum which the Bharatiya Janata Partyfilled.However, if Greece and India witnessed political upheaval after big games, it does not necessarily meanthat Qatar too may face the same predicament. Several other countries have utilised such opportunityto market their own culture, ideology, religion and political objective.