Partition of India

With reference to Digvijay Singh’s statement on partition of India (January 28), HM Seervai, former  Advocate-General of Maharashtra and believed to be India’s topmost authority on constitutional law

Written by

Published on

August 18, 2022

With reference to Digvijay Singh’s statement on partition of India (January 28), HM Seervai, former  Advocate-General of Maharashtra and believed to be India’s topmost authority on constitutional law, states in his famous book Partition of India – Legend and Reality that “It was a strange irony that Jinnah who was a staunch nationalist and Congress leader from 1906 to 1920, when he was applauded as the ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity by Sarojini Naidu and various Hindu leaders with his monumental Lucknow Pact of 1921 turns, by force of circumstances, into a communalist by the fag end of 1940, particularly due to unhelpful attitude of the 1937 provisional elections.  Even then he stood for a united India.  He wanted parity and not partition”.

It is unfortunate that in discussing the problem of partition, even after such a long gap we have not been able to clear many cobwebs.  It is, indeed, found that much before Jinnah advocated partition of India, Lala Lajpat Rai had, in a series of 13 articles in The Tribune (Nov 26-Dec 17, 1924) pleaded for the division of Punjab and Bengal on communal lines.

Ruby Naushad

Bangalore, Karnataka