‘Political Protest isn’t a Crime’: SafooraZargar Seeks Discharge from UAPA Charges in Delhi Violence Case

Advocate Alam emphasised that dissent and criticism of the government are hallmarks of democracy and do not amount to terrorist activity. She contended that invoking UAPA against peaceful protestors like Zargar sets a dangerous precedent and undermines fundamental rights.

Written by

Published on

May 27, 2025

Student activist SafooraZargar, facing charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with the 2020 Northeast Delhi violence, appeared before a Delhi court on May 20 to seek her discharge, asserting that peaceful political protest should not be criminalised, reported the Maktoob Media.

Zargar, currently out on bail, was represented by Advocate Shahrukh Alam before Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai at the Karkardooma Court. Her legal team argued that the accusations against her are rooted in her participation in constitutionally protected protests against the CAA.

Advocate Alam emphasised that dissent and criticism of the government are hallmarks of democracy and do not amount to terrorist activity. She contended that invoking UAPA against peaceful protestors like Zargar sets a dangerous precedent and undermines fundamental rights.

Zargar, an M.Phil. scholar at Jamia Millia Islamia and member of the Jamia Coordination Committee, was arrested in April 2020 during her pregnancy and later granted bail on humanitarian grounds. She was accused, along with other anti-CAA activists, of conspiring to incite the communal violence in Northeast Delhi, a narrative heavily contested by civil society and human rights groups.

The violence, which disproportionately targeted Muslims, was reportedly sparked by inflammatory remarks made by BJP leader Kapil Mishra.